On Target Pressure Points: The Electronic Concentration Camp

GMO feed turns pig stomachs to mush! Shocking photos reveal severe damage caused by GM soy and corn

Wednesday, June 12, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) If you have stomach problems or gastrointestinal problems, a new study led by Dr. Judy Carman may help explain why: pigs fed a diet of genetically engineered soy and corn showed a 267% increase in severe stomach inflammation compared to those fed non-GMO diets. In males, the difference was even more pronounced: a 400% increase. (For the record, most autistic children are males, and nearly all of them have severe intestinal inflammation.)

The study was conducted on 168 young pigs on an authentic farm environment and was carried out over a 23-week period by eight researchers across Australia and the USA. The lead researcher, Dr. Judy Carman, is from the Institute of Health and Environmental Research in Kensington Park, Australia. The study has now been published in the Journal of Organic Systems, a peer-reviewed science journal.

The study is the first to show what appears to be a direct connection between the ingestion of GMO animal feed and measurable damage to the stomachs of those animals. Tests also showed abnormally high uterine weights of animals fed the GMO diets, raising further questions about the possibility of GMOs causing reproductive organ damage.

Read the full article

Some of the Sheep Are No Longer Asleep

by Dave Hodges – thecommonsenseshow.com May 16, 2013

The world is finally beginning to wake up to the global tyranny that is threatening all of humanity. In the past two months I have heard from people that I have not heard from or seen for 10-20 years. I have heard from former players, students, friends and neighbors.

Several people contacting out of my distant past may not sound significant, but I had zero expectation of hearing from any of these people again. And all of the contacts were motivated by their concern for the decimation of our Republic and my work towards reversing the trend curve.

Sometimes as I pound away at my keyboard in the middle of the night, I wonder if I am making a difference with regard to awakening the multitude of sheep in this country. Frequently, I have wondered if any of us are making a real difference. Yet, I have met so many gifted morally upstanding people in our Patriot movement. The majority of the people in the alternative media, too many to mention, have talent, charisma, intelligence, education, a love of God and country and are only motivated by the desire to live in a society which is governed by people who want to help their fellow man, not to enslave them.

I am very gratified to say that my personal barometer says that after a long battle, the journalists in the truthful media are beginning to reach a critical mass of influence. In the classic book written by Malcom Gladwell, The Tipping Point, postulates what it takes to get an idea to go viral. True to Gladwell’s premises, we in the alternative media have dramatically increased our contact base and our subsequent reach.
Read the full article

Graphic: How NSA collects, analyzes phone records

Keeping top-secret tabs on your phone calls

The U.S. government is secretly collecting and analyzing the phone records of millions of Americans. One operation, authorized by a secret court order, requires a subsidiary of telecom giant Verizon to give the National Security Agency extensive data on phone calls of customers from April 25 to July 19. One possible process of how the NSA and Verizon are operating:

• 

Read the full article

This abuse of the Patriot Act must end

Sunday 9 June 2013 07.00 EDT
This abuse of the Patriot Act must end

President Obama falsely claims Congress authorised all NSA surveillance. In fact, our law was designed to protect liberties

Jim Sensenbrenner

We’ve gotten used to what “Big Government” looks like – Washington’s unchecked deficit spending, the Obama administration’s policing of the press and the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups. But the problem is bigger than we thought. “Big Brother” is watching. And he is monitoring the phone calls and digital communications of every American, as well as of any foreigners who make or receive calls to or from the United States.

Last week, the Guardian reported that the Obama administration is collecting records of every call made to, from or within the US, as well as records of many digital communications. President Obama has tried to deflect criticism by claiming “every member of Congress has been briefed on this program.” While some members of Congress were briefed – particularly those on the intelligence committees – most, including myself, were not.

The administration claims authority to sift through details of our private lives because the Patriot Act says that it can. I disagree. I authored the Patriot Act, and this is an abuse of that law.

I was the chairman of the House judiciary committee when the US was attacked on 11 September 2001. Five days later, the Justice Department delivered its proposal for new legislation. Although I, along with every other American, knew we had to strengthen our ability to combat those targeting our country, this version went too far. I believed then and now that we can defend our country and our liberty at the same time.

I immediately called then-House Speaker Dennis Hastert and asked him for time to redraft the legislation. I told the speaker that if the legislation moved forward as drafted, I would not only vote against it, but would actively oppose it.

The country wanted action, and the pressure from the White House was intense. To his credit, Speaker Hastert gave us more time. There were endless meetings and non-stop negotiations with the White House, the FBI and the intelligence community. The question could not have been more fundamental: how could we defend our liberty and protect the American people at the same time?

The legislation had to be narrowly tailored – everyone agreed that we could not allow unrestrained surveillance. The Patriot Act had 17 provisions. To prevent abuse, I insisted on sunsetting all the provisions so that they would automatically expire if Congress did not renew them. This would allow Congress to conduct oversight of the administration’s implementation of the act.
Read the full article

Are Chemtrails & Disease Pandemics linked to Pharmaceutical Companies and their Economic Growth?

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

By: Stewart Brennan
World United News
http://worldunitednews.blogspot.com/

There are a lot of unanswered questions when the subject of Chemtrails comes up, especially when the government of Canada remains elusive on the topic. Government’s are supposed to answer to the people, but of course this has not been the case in Canada. So, what is it that is being sprayed in our skies, why are they doing it, and why is there so much secrecy in what appears to be a massive operation taking place right in front of our eyes?

I’ve personally been watching Chemtrails since just after 911 in 2001. At that time I lived in Ayer’s Cliff Quebec near the Vermont border. Back then the US air force seemed to come out of nowhere to patrol the skies in our region. A sleeping giant had awoken after 911 and we in Ayer’s Cliff just figured it would go back to sleep after a couple of months of drills and that would be the end of it.

The presence of the US air force was not a welcome sight for me and nor were the grid styled chemtrails that descended over the country by high flying military aircraft. What could I do…

It wasn’t until 2005 – 2006 when I picked up photography that I began to notice Chemtrails again. They appeared in a number of my photo’s but I still had not put much thought into them. At the time, they were just interesting targets to take pictures of.
Read the full article

Contrail Science: Deliberate Ambiguity Betrays Scientific Method

Posted by Rusty Chemtrail Evidence, Featured Videos Thursday, June 6th, 2013

CONTRAIL SCIENCE: Debunking a Deliberate Ambiguity Campaign by Federal Agencies and Internet Trolls who attempt to Hide Public Awareness of two decades of Covert Aerosol Geoengineering that is responsible for warming the climate and manipulating the weather. (source)

Much ambiguity has been circulated regarding the effect of humidity upon the persistence of contrails, or vapor trails. Numerous sources, without exception, state that such vapor trails (composed of water vapor by historical and conventional definition) may persist for “extended periods” under conditions of “higher” relative humidity.

Unfortunately, it is apparent that quantitative information attached to these repeated generalizations is lacking. Even the recently issued “fact sheet” under distribution by a combination of federal agencies, including the EPA, NOAA, the FAA and NASA falls victim to this same deficiency. — Cliff Carnicom

In the video below we take a look at NASA’s CONTRAIL SCIENCE website to learn how to differentiate between three types of jet aircraft contrails.

1) Short-lived, non-persistent contrail (SLNPC),

2) Persistent contrail, non-spreading (PCNS) ,

3) Persistent contrail, spreading (PCS)

We want to know under what conditions – and how often we can expect to see different manifestations of persistent contrails – whether it’s the non-spreading or spreading type.

The data available from various weather sonde systems sharply contradicts NASA’s claim that persistent contrails are a common atmospheric response to jet aircraft emissions.

The U. Wyoming is one source that aggregates atmospheric conditions collected at many sites around the US, Europe and beyond. The data above 8,500 meters or 28,000 feet reveals that conditions for formation of “persistent contrails” due to high relative humidity can be defined as a rare occurrence in typical flight paths by commercial and private jet aircraft.

NASA defines PCNS as a separate species of artificial cloud from the PCS type. NASA also avoids concluding that a PCS is necessarily evolved from a PCNS. It is, therefore possible that a PSC can either be evolved from a PCNS or appear spontaneously as a “spreading” PCS emission without ever being defined as a PCNS.  ***More
Read the full article

The 25 Rules of Disinformation

May 24th, 2011

The 25 Rules of Disinformation
May 24th, 2011 | Category: Latest News |108 Comments

7236 1650 1426 13.6K

From Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, from political debates, to television shows, to comments on a blog.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
Read the full article

It’s on! Farmers begin suing Monsanto over genetic pollution of wheat crops

Wednesday, June 05, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) The next wave of farmer backlash against Monsanto has just been unleashed by Ernest Barnes, a wheat farmer in Morton County, Kansas. He filed suit this week in the U.S. District Court in Wichita, Kansas, alleging that Monsanto’s genetic pollution has financially damaged himself and other farmers.

Barnes’ case appears to be well supported by the facts: Last week the USDA announced the shock discovery that genetically engineered wheat strains from Monsanto’s open-field experiments had escaped and spread into commercial wheat farms. Almost immediately, Japan and South Korea cancelled wheat purchase contracts from the United States, and more cancellations are expected to follow. The more countries reject U.S. wheat due to GMO contamination (genetic pollution), the lower wheat prices will plunge and the more economic damage will be felt by U.S. farmers.

Monsanto now a confirmed genetic polluter
GMO wheat (i.e. “GE wheat”) has never been commercially grown in the United States… at least not on purpose. Experimental fields were approved by the USDA and planted across 16 U.S. states. Until now, it was not known that these GE wheat experiments escaped their designated field plots and began to spread as a form of self-replicating genetic pollution.

Read the full article

Ron Paul: “It’s Going to Get Much, Much Worse”

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 06/09/2013 21:03 -0400

 

Dr. Ron Paul has long been a leading voice for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, civil liberty, and non-interventionist foreign policies.

His last term in the U.S. House of Representatives ended earlier this year, so we caught up with the former Congressman to get his latest perspective on how successfully our national leadership is dealing with America’s economic challenges.

In Dr. Paul’s assessment, Washington is too committed to deficit spending and the debt-based economy – both operationally and philosophically – to expect it to embrace a more fiscally-responsible model without a forcing crisis (which he believes is coming):

[T]hey believe it like a religion that spending is good no matter what the spending is on. And that the deficits don’t matter; deficits are not a burden. And even though we have this national debt and we have a foreign debt, they don’t consider that so bad, as long as people will spend money. And if the people won’t spend any money, the government has this moral obligation to do it.

 
Read the full article