Daily Truth Pills

Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge…

Without Prejudice UCC 1.207 / 1-308

Posted by truthpills on 2009/02/03

Remedy and Recourse

Every system of civilized law must have two characteristics: Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way to get out from under the law. The Recourse provides that if you have been damaged under the law, you can recover your loss. The Common Law, the Law of Merchants, and even the Uniform Commercial Code all have remedy and recourse, but for a long time we could not find it. If you go to a law library and ask to see the Uniform Commercial Code they will show you a tremendous shelf completely filled with the Uniform Commercial Code. When you pick up one volume and start to read it, it will seem to have been intentionally written to be confusing. It took us a long time to discover where the Remedy and Recourse are found in the U.C.C. They are found right in the first volume, at 1-207 and 1-103.

Remedy

“The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel.” (UCC 1-207.7)

It is important to remember when we go into a court, that we are in a commercial, international jurisdiction. If we go into court and say. “I DEMAND MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!”, the judge will most likely say, “You mention the Constitution again, and I’ll find you in contempt of court!” Then we don’t understand how he can do that. Hasn’t he sworn to uphold the Constitution? The rule here is: you cannot be charged under one jurisdiction and defend yourself under another jurisdiction. For example, if the French government came to you and asked where you filed your French income tax of a certain year, do you go to the French government and say “I demand my Constitutional Rights?” No. The proper answer is: “THE LAW DOES NOT APPLY TO ME. I AM NOT A FRENCHMAN.” You must make your reservation of rights under the jurisdiction in which you are charged, not under some other jurisdiction. So in a UCC court, you must claim your Reservation of Rights under UCC 1-207.

UCC 1-207 goes on to say…

“When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date.” (UCC 1-207.9)

You have to make your claim known early. Further, it says:

“The Sufficiency of the Reservation: any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights is sufficient, such as “without prejudice”. (UCC 1-207.4)

Whenever you sign any legal paper that deals with Federal Reserve Notes, write under your signature: “Without Prejudice (UCC 1-207.4).” This reserves your rights. You can show, at UCC 1-207.4, that you have sufficiently reserved your rights.

It is very important to understand just what this means. For example, one man who used this in regard to a traffic ticket was asked by the judge just what he meant by writing “without prejudice UCC 1-207″ on his statement to the court? He had not tried to understand the concepts involved. He only wanted to use it to get out of the ticket. He did not know what it meant. When the judge asked him what he meant by signing in that way, he told the judge he was not prejudice against anyone… The judge knew that the man had no idea what it meant, and he lost the case. You must know what it means!

Without Prejudice UCC 1.207

When you use “without prejudice UCC 1-207″ in connection with your signature, you are saying, “I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.”

What is the compelled performance of an unrevealed commercial agreement? When you use Federal Reserve Notes instead of silver dollars, is it voluntary? No. There is no lawful money or alternative, so you have to use Federal Reserve Notes; you have to accept the benefit. The government has given you the benefit to discharge your debts with limited liability, and you don’t have to pay your debts. How nice they are! But if you did not reserve your rights under 1-207.7, you are compelled to accept the benefit, and are therefore obliged to obey every statute, ordinance, and regulation of the government, at all levels of government; federal, state and local.

If you understand this, you will be able to explain it to the judge when he asks. And he will ask, so be prepared to explain it to the court. You will also need to understand UCC 1-103, the argument and recourse. If you want to understand this fully, go to a law library and photocopy these two sections from the UCC. It is important to get the Anderson, 3rd edition. Some of the law libraries will only have the West Publishing version, and it is very difficult to understand. In Anderson, it is broken down with decimals into ten parts and, most importantly, it is written in plain English.

Recourse

The Recourse appears in the Uniform Commercial Code at 1-103.6, which says:

“The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force, except where displaced by the code. A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law.” (UCC 1-103.6)

This is the argument we use in court. The Code recognizes the Common Law. If it did not recognize the Common Law, the government would have had to admit that the United States is bankrupt, and is completely owned by its creditors. But, it is not expedient to admit this, so the Code was written so as not to abolish the Common Law entirely. Therefore, if you have made a sufficient, timely, and explicit reservation of your rights at 1-207, you may then insist that the statutes be construed in harmony with the Common Law.

If the charge is a traffic ticket, you may demand that the court produce the injured person who has filed a verified complaint. If, for example, you were charged with failure to buckle your seat belt, you may ask the court: “Who was injured as a result of your failure to ‘buckle up’?” However, if the judge won’t listen to you and just moves ahead with the case, then you will want to read to him the last sentence of 103.6, which states: (2) Actually, it is better to use a rubber stamp, because this demonstrates that you had previously reserved your rights. The simple fact that it takes several days or a week to order and get a stamp shows that you had reserved your rights before signing the document. Anderson Uniform Commercial Code Lawyers’ Cooperative Publishing Co. The Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law section. Tell the judge, “Your Honor, I can sue you under the Common Law, for violating my rights under the Uniform Commercial Code. I have a remedy, under the UCC, to reserve my rights under the Common Law. I have exercised the remedy, and now you must construe this statute in harmony with the Common Law. To be in harmony with the Common Law, you must come forth with the damaged party.”

If the judge insists on proceeding with the case, just act confused and ask this question: “Let me see if I understand, Your Honor, has this court made a legal determination that sections 1-207 and 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which is the system of law you are operating under, are not valid law before this court?”

Now the judge is in a jam! How can the court throw out one part of the Code and uphold another? If he answers, “yes”, then you say: “I put this court on notice that I am appealing your legal determination.” Of course, the higher court will uphold the Code on appeal. The judge knows this, so once again you have boxed him in.

Explain U.C.C. 1-207

If you are confronted with explaining what the “UCC 1-207″ does here is
your answer.

When you are going to sign a contract ( drivers license, lease, buying a
automobile, snowmobile, a building permit, marriage license, devoice decree,
or any other document).

BEFORE you sign!!! you have the right to draw a fine line through any
thing that is not to your liking. It can be a number, a letter, a word or a
group of words. At this time you can add any thing you want in the contract.
Any changes you have made sign your name close to it and date it. A contract
is to have all of the contract in full disclosure at the time of signing. If
not the UCC 1-207 will stop you from giving up your rights on the contract
you are about to sign and void out any part of the contract that you have
not had the opportunity to view.

Now how the UCC 1-207 works.

After you put UCC 1-207 where your signature is going to be. ” your
signature” is the last you thing you put on the document. When you pick up
your pen from the signed contract it is consummated, you have given up your
right to change the contract. Here is some more UCC information. You can go
to a public law library for more information.

Read the full article
UCC 1-207 discussion

About these ads

81 Responses to “Without Prejudice UCC 1.207 / 1-308”

  1. dear sir I HAVE SIGN THE RESEVATION OF RIGHTS . WHAT COULD I DO TO END MY SMALL DEBT. THANK YOU.

    • dell said

      You can!!! Please Read U.S Constitution Article 1 Section 10.1 — No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.

      • IF YOU DONT HAVE ANY MONEY PLEASE READ THE COINAGE ACT OF 1792 SECTION 9 AND 19 MEMORIZE IT AND ASK THE JUDGE IF HES TAKEN AN OATH AND THAT YOU WANT A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS OATH HIM AND THE PROSECUTING ATT. AFTER YOU RECEIVE A COPY OR CETIFIED COPY FIND A CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFF AND YOU AND A WITT. ( NOT A COWARD ) SWEAR OUT A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE JUDGE AND ATT. FOR VIOLATING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE THE SHERIFF SHOULD DELIVER THE COMPLAINT TO THE FORMAN OF A GRAND JURY MOST LIKELY THAT THE GRAND JURY WILL RETURN A TRUE BILL FOR INDICTMENT FOR FELONY TREASON . AND THATS ANYONE THAT ORDERS YOU TO PAY A BILL WITH FEDERAL RESERVE DEBT NOTE . BUT YOU MUST ASSERT YOUR RIGHT FROM THE GET GO .
        MAKE SURE THAT THE GRAND JURY UNDERSTANDS WHAT LAWFULL MONEY IS ACCORDING TO THE COINAGE ACT OF 1792 .
        PLEASE TEACH YOUR CHILDREN THE U S CONSTITUTION THANK YOU .

    • I looked in the U S Constitution for the u c c and it is no where to be found so ! if you find your rights in the U S Constitution then you can accert them lawfully but dont do it leagaly by a statued created and designed to trade a right for a privilege .by the criminals in the black robe ..
      Only the U S Constitution can save our country and its people . And For The People That Know That Their Rights Are In The Articles Of The Bill Of Rights .
      Most of the amendmnt are in conflict with the the U S Constitution .! chalenge yourself and see if you can find the conflicts . or send me your number and I will tell you . Thank You

      • 32892rta said

        Joe,
        The 17th amendment is completely unconstitutional. The framers actually forbade the discussion of how senators are chosen, yet an uninformed and uneducated populace did not stand up and fight it. That one amendment doomed the republic. That is why the states have no power now, the have no representation. Can you imagine Obamacare being passed in a true jurisdictional senate. I can tell you right now it would not have gotten but a handful of votes. I am all for a constitutional convention to repeal the 17th amendment. It is our only chance to save the republic.

  2. jay said

    so traffic violations r not laws but indeed ordinences? so say i got a speeding ticket and i sign the ticket under duress all rights reserved then my name and ask the courts to bring fourth the injured parties and they cant this will void said ticket and no fine will have to b paid? or do i need to show them that i understand wat i am talking about and say something like under UCC 1-308 of the common law i have given the remedy by reserving my rights now you must bring fourth somebody i have hurt while i was speeding because i have not broken a law but an ordinence? id really like to hear back from u im really getting tired of this small town court system holding me down and telling me if i dont have the money to pay my ticket i will have to b on probation wich then has monthly fees and ups my fine and subjects me to drug testing and monitoring…for a traffic violation come on is it legal for them to do this to me?

    • shawna said

      your best bet is to talk to a lawyer to see what your options are.

      • Shawn Alan said

        Boy that was helpful Shawna, you might as well not have even commented. If you’re going to offer advice offer something useful or don’t say anything.

      • Pope said

        Shawna you are better off keeping your stupid mouth shut!! Get a lawyer??/ Even though you are the client a lawyers first commitment is to the court ……Jack ass!

    • P. Zander said

      Forensic Documents Research (of CA) Pamela Zander (760) 617-7989

      The last reply is from 2010. Is this still a valid site? I am in appeals with my house and used the UCC 1.207. I will let you know how this works, as my home was stolen and sold, we then, were evicted. The Superior court judge dismissed my Quiet Title action while it was in Fed. Court? WHAT? He certainly did not have jurisdiction.
      I file UCC-1 Financial Statements against anyone who “unlawfully seizes” homes by Foreclosure. THe UCC-1 Lien is filed with the Secretary of State and is an effective tool against phony lenders and servicers. I also file Land Patent docouments in which I will use the UCC as stated above. This is the “silver platter” the Government is beginning to use! Read-up people.

      • Lynnette Alexander said

        I am looking forward to your update. I have heard of someone who did use it under his signature on a speeding ticket and it never went to court and he never heard from them again. So I’m curious to see/hear if this has worked for someone else.

      • Joseph LAmarca said

        IF THEY FEEL LIKE TO LET YOU KEEP THE HOUSE ITS STILL A FRAUD . BECAUSE YOU PAID IT WITH FRAUDULANT FEDERAL RESERVE DEBT NOTE AND YOU ARE TRYING TO KEEP YOUR HOME WITH THEIR TREASONIST FRAUDULANT STATUED RULES

        READ ARTICLE READ ARTICLE 4 , 5 AND 7 OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS ! THOSE THREE ARE YOUR RIGHTS BUT THERE IS ONE SMALL PROBLEM , YOU NEED TO SUE WHOM EVER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT GIVING YOU A LAND GRANT ON THE LAND THAT YOUR HOME SITS ON . GOOD LUCK BUT WE THE PEOPLE DONT OWN ANYTHING THAT IS REGISTERED OR LICENSED OR TITLED !!! Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 03:39:45 +0000 To: josephlamarca@hotmail.com

      • 32892rta said

        P. Zander http://www.teamlaw.org is an excellent resource. Also there is a book called Clouded Titles. It may be very helpful to you because most of the time they can not produce a proper title.

      • I am very glad that you had the balls to hang up on pamela I was just trying to help you !!!

      • get your contract out when you and the ??? signed the agreement you will discover only your signature is on it and not the banker , they needed to get a phoney co signer on there so that they could sell the contract to other investor and thats what makes it fraud I hope that you understand that , if not

    • bc said

      jay, if you have been to court already, it is time to get a lawyer. You do have the right to counsel, as to your Miranda rights, one can be provided for you…but, read this, it may explain things to you, its not whether it is a law or an ordinance, it the type of judicial system you are being tried in.

      http://freedom-school.com/the-ucc-connection.html

    • mnac said

      Shawna you are a “doughnut” please let your brain engage before opening your mouth.

  3. yes, once you have reserved your rights under the ucc, is there a time limit on how long this last? because i’m a sovereign citizen in the sovereign republic of KENTUCKY. i was looking for a debt solution for credit cards. this law firm called johnsons law firm called me. before i could lick my lips twice, they JOHNSON LAW FIR OUT OF LAS VEGAS NV, HAD ME SIGNED UP TO TAKE CARE OF MY CREDIT CARD SOLUTION, INSTEAD OF TAKING BANKRUPTCY. JOHNSON LAW GROUP had debited my checking acct 2 times in the same month. these papers they faxed to me i did use ucc 1-207 and ucc 1-103. i also put them on notice through a e-mail. i kept a copy. thes guys had 63 complaints in 36 mos. then i knew i had been taken, what do you suggest? i have change phone #, and opened a new bank acct. and before they try to attach my home i’m fixing to take out a loan on it. is this wise? atleast i know it will be safe. i do not owe anything on my home. but i dont know if this JOHNSON LAW GROUP will try to put a lean on it. i could use all the help i can get. do you have any suggestions? i’ve allready contacted the BBB OF LAS VEGAS,NV AND ALSO REPORTED IT TO THE ATTY GENERALS OFFICE HERE IN KY.before i let some crooks like these take my home it will be after the battle. i do believe the ucc is on my side. i’ve been studying the ucc for 20 years. at first it was at the federal law library, then when i got my pc, made it somewhat easier. thanks. be listening for a reply,

    • Gary said

      When you recieve a letter from a debt collector do not open it, instead blackout your mailing address and then on the right side of the letter write in bold letters write…NO CONTRACT, then underline beneath this and write DO NOT UNDERSTAND. And below that write NO LIABILITY. then send it back. A bill collector can not produce a contract you entered into with them. They bought the debt and are attempting to collect on something you have no debt on because the debt has been discharged

  4. undr these laws of the ucc, oir commomn law rights are discrimated against. also we still each state is a sovereign republic. also there are 2 united states of america. first you have the conniential united states, and the federal united states. when you have capitalism, sc=ocialism, and communism you have a deadly mix. all you have to do is read the constitution of the united states. our forefathers left a flaw when devising the constitution. you must protect yourself in everyway possible. when you have the remedy and recourse you have a legal instrument. the politicians do not want the average people to know about this. but all of the answers are in the anderson eddition. look in book 1. ucc1-207 anducc1-103. we need to take our country back over. and when i say we i mean the people. the people has the power, just as juriors has the power in a court room. the judge is only a refree. look around you and see whats happening to our country. it all started when nakatia kruscheff told the us back in the 60s that comminision would take over the us without firing a shot. and the real biggie is the maffia. these people run everything world wide. they decide what is gonna happen. kook at jimmy hoffia, they are still trying to find him. good luck, because your not gonna found him. when you go to church, school, court you will see the american flag and a state flag. the gold fringe around it means you have no rights. this means the federal goverment can come in and cease and take everything you have. there is gonna be another civil war in this country. people as myself are tired of paying taxes. this nation is headed for bankruptcy. srart reading and enforce your common law rights. if not this nation is gonna fall just as ROMAN EMPIRE did. and its not to far off. the enemy has been here ever since world war 2. how much longer can we go on? we are dealing with federal reserve notes that isnt worth a shit. paper only. but gold and silver is substance.real money and not fake. we have so many races in this country its pathatectic. i my self is a forner. this land belongs to the native american indians. and slowly they are getting their land back. man is destroying himself. before long there will be a day of reconing for all the planet earth. personnaly i think we need to get rid of all the crooks starting on a local level all the way to the federal level. start over. i hope each and every human being on this planet wakes up and smells the roses, before its to late. good luck and god bless the planet that he created. thats right he created. nothing on this planet belongs to god. not us. be ready at all times. it can happen in a twinkle of a eye.

    • The last Roman Emperor was a christian and he had a Republic form of Government Until the Vatican and the King of what we cal U K today they decided to get rid of the Republic as they intend to get rid of ours . So lets forget all the bull shit code and amendment and study only the U S Constitution ( 7 Articles of Confederation witch our hired help suppose to follow and we the people are to make sure that they follow our command that is embedded in our Bill Of Rights .).
      Leave the amendment process witch they are unconstitutional up to the criminals to follow !!!!If you think that you understand the U S Constitution then find the conflict between the federal constitution and the U S Constitution
      Go For It

  5. JONES FLECTURE said

    NEED TO KNOW MORE.THIS GOV IS OUT OF CONTROL,NEED HELP PLEASE.THANK YOU

  6. Karen Edwards said

    i would like to find out more info about/what the ucc 1.207 can benefit me and my family. me great-grand parents are black frechman.

  7. toe said

    @Dennis Wright: If someone attempted taking my house, I’d put a common law lien against it; its equal to the $ value of the house (that you spent, either in principal or interest, or both) and must be satisfied before any other lien can be put on it; so if you spent $400,000 in interest and principal, its a $400,000 common law lien with YOU as the creditor

  8. toe said

    That is an example of a common law remedy; all these people who lost their houses could have used that remedy to prevent a foreclosure because:

    The currency system we have is debt-based; there is NO MONEY!!! For a bank to foreclose on a common law liened house, they must first pay off the lien in place; to do that, they must put a loss on their books (considering the value of REAL PROPERTY is VALUED, whereas federal reserve notes are NEGATIVE VALUE)….that loss is compounded due to the fact that they will pay with debt, and it will take twice as much to make that VALUE equal in NEGATIVE VALUE (or market-accepted value)

    In that situation, nobody will ever be foreclosed on, because that booked loss is unacceptable in a system where a bank can never be negative(or positive, if you look at it in the REAL sense).

    Personally, I’d file a UCC-1 asap )take control of your legal fiction), file an Affidavit of Sovereignty (you can find templates all over the net) and file a common law lien on your property to prevent seizure w/o due process (which you can sue for damages on).
    If you have time on your hands, study the Federal Rules on Criminal Procedure, the UCC, U.S.C., your state Constitution, and common law remedies; educate yourself on your power! :) Good luck

  9. Good and best imformem I have came to and long time.

  10. EXCELLENT INFORMATION…THANK YOU

  11. Dan Bahr said

    Will these 2 UCC codes UCC 1.207 / 1-308 will these help me in family court? As I have been out of work and can not make the payment schedule they said I had to abide by when I was working at the time. Also will this stop me from being in civil contempt of court? I know they are violating many of my constitutional rights but in family court they dont recoginize that you have any rights at all. Please get back to me on this issue ASAP.

    • Earl said

      Join the yahoo group mensissuesonline for help with this issue.

    • RIC said

      I TOO HAVE FAMILY COURT PROBLEMS. STRANGE PEOPLE UP MY BUTT MAKING MY FAMILY AND MYSELF JUMP THROUGH HOOPS,PAY FOR THIS AND THAT, COMING INTO MY HOME, SECRETLY PULLING MY KIDS ASIDE AND TALKING TO THEM AND GETTING NO ANSWERS ABOUT WHAT WAS TALKED TO MY KIDS ABOUT.STANGE NOT LAWS HAVE BEEN BROKEN, YET ALL THIS SH– IS GOING ON AND ON. WHAT CAN UCC1-308 DO, WHAT CAN I DO. I’M DESPERATE. HELP

      • shawna said

        best bet is to get a lawyer fast. you might have to go to legal aid. you need to protect yourself legally. children are may be led by investigators in a way that you may not be good for your family`s situation. good luck.

    • joemama said

      I would make a motion for a contempt hearing then schedule it with the judges secratery.I would explain I have no money and is it the courts intention to imprison me for a debt? Don’t let them keep you in perpetual contempt end it with a hearing.

  12. Kathy Vernoy said

    I need to know if the UCC 1-207 AND 1-308 will help me in family court. My husband has paid more than what the child support would have been from the time it was ordered till the children were grown. Due to lay offs and such they added penalties and interest to the child support during the time he could not pay. No matter how much he paid extra after returning to work it never touched what they continued to add in interest ever month. The “children” are 25 to 30 years old. And they still are adding charges every month. Dan Bahr is right you have no rights in family court. These are from two other States not the one we live in. How would we go about this and which States would we have to do this in the one we live in or all three. Need an answer ASAP. Thank you.

    • You should get you a black law dictionary or go to a law library and locate /ask the librarian to show you Sheppard’s citation and look up the word ( RESCIND ) then bring all license’s / birth certificates and rescind all those privileges
      due to the fact that they did not disclose all the facts of fraud in the above contract .. now you can use without prejudice U C C 1-207.
      You need to study The Bill Of Rights and know how to apply them and only then You are the Boss of the public servants and when they fail to obey that means they broke their oath/promise to serve and now you got them in bad place ! that situation its called felony treason .
      You need help of some patriot that lives near you and is well versed with the U S Constitution and a law library .
      Without Prejudice i-207 Joe L’Amarca

  13. Marco Polo said

    Anybody that actually attempts this court will likely be held in contempt

    I am not saying it is right but the rule of law has been undermined

  14. Hosting…

    Without Prejudice UCC 1.207 / 1-308 « Daily Truth Pills…

  15. Roger Bright said

    If i sign a letter written to the IRS with without Prejudice UCC1-207 / UCC 1-308. Would that be to much? if 1-207 has been repealed – one site said it had in 2004, then will 1-308 cover it all?

  16. Will Bowie said

    Recently renewed drivers license in Michigan.Clerk told me it was against the law to sign my name with the ucc-1-207 .Well of course I demanded to see the law.She called her supervisor over and told me i had my state legislators to thank.Asked if they were giving legal advice? She showed me some rules of procedure out of a three ring binder that they cannot accept signatures with ucc-1-207 without prejiduce.When i asked for a copy she refused.When i pushed and told her i would foia them she said that they were not subject to foia.The last thing the supervisor said WE ARE NOT STUPID.So she toar up document and filled out another.So i scribbled something that might look like my hand writing U.D.and she accepted it.Called secratary of state got no where was told people already have tried to sue them.Have started letter writing to secratary and state rep will continue to persue information.Sounds like a title 42 law suit to me. Christian Patriot.

    • freeman said

      Sir, I’m about to jump down the rabbit hole as well in Michigan, and I was extremely interested in an update…

    • Frank Koller said

      TITLE 18: USC: SEC. 241, SEC. 242

    • OUT OF FIFETY TITLES 2/3 ARE NEGATIVE AND 1/3 POSETIVE TITLES WICH ONES IS TITLE 42 ? DOES IT SUPERCEEDE THE U S CONSTITUTION ?
      IF A PUBLIICSERVANTS DENIES YOUR U S CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS YOU CAN OWN THEM PEOPLE FIRST THE ELECTED OFFICIALS AND THEN THE APPOINTED ASSHOLES .

      • FIND IN THE U S CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 DOES IT READ THAT A PUBLIC SERVANT CAN COMPEL YOU AGAINST YOUR WISH AND OVER YOUR OBJECTION THAT THEY CAN FORCE YOU OR TELL YOU HOW TO WRITE YOUR RIGHTS TO A CONTRACT ?
        REMEMBER THE U S CONSTITUTION HAD THIRTEEN PROPOSALS THREE PROPOSALS WERE REJECTED AND TEN OF THEM BECAME KNOWN AS THE BILL OF RIGHTS OR ( CONTRACT ) THE INDIVIDUAL THAT DEPRIVED YOU OF YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEED RIGHT COMITED A FELONY TREASON . STUDY THE ARTICLES OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND DONT EVER GIVE OR THINK THAT YOU DONT HAVE THEM RIGHTS , IF YOU DONT KNOW THAT YOU HAVE ANY RIGHTS HOW CAN YOU ASSERT THEM ?
        OH ! BY THE WAY DONT SAY AMENDMENT THE BILL OF RIGHTS ARE ARTICLE OF YOUR RIGHTS , THEY ARE GUARANTEED TO YOU AND EVERY OTHER INDIVIDUALS .BUT PLEASE COMPARE THE 11 TH AMENDMENT WITH ARTICLE 3 SEC . TWO OF THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDARATION , SEE IF YOU CAN SPOT THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TWO AND THAT WAS THE REASON WHY IT WAS REJECTED THE FIRST TIME WHEN IT WAS PROPOSED AND THATS AN AMENDMENT.
        THE CRIMINALS IN THE HOUSE HAVE AMENDED YOUR RIGHTS AWAY BUT NOT MINE

  17. Charles said

    HOMEPAGE

    The best way to get in touch is via email to:
    phoenixx@wt.net

    This website is published common law copyright 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and thereafter

    This site is an explicit exercise of all my prerogatives and rights, priviledges,immunities, protections, and guarantees of the Constitution for the United States of America, as established in 1789 and amended on December 15th, 1791 with the Bill of Rights and which explicitly apply at all times whatsoever to all matters whatsoever.
    UCC 103-6
    UCC 207-5

    A copy of that supreme law of the land is for viewing at this site.

    From United States Supreme Court decision, Ex parte Milligan:

    “This nation, as experience has proved,cannot always remain at peace, and has no right to expect that it will always have wise and humane rulers sincerely attached to the principles of the Constitution. Wicked men ambitious of power, with hatred of liberty and contempt of law, may fill the place once occupied by Washington and Lincoln, and if this right is conceded, and the calamities of war again befall us, the dangers to human liberty are frightful to contemplate- If our fathers had failed to provide for just such a contingency, they would have been false to the trust reposed in them. They knew — the history of the world told them— the nation they were founding, be its existence short or long would be involved in war; how often or how long continued human foresight could not tell, and unlimited power, wherever lodged at such a time, was especially hazardous to freemen. For this and other equally weighty reasons, they secured the inheritance they had fought to maintain by incorporating in a written constitution the safeguards which time had proved were essential to its preservation. Not one of these safeguards can the President or Congress or the Judiciary disturb, except the one concerning the writ of habeas corpus.”

    Ex parte Milligan
    4 Wallace 2, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)

    in·cor·po·rate (¹n-kôr“p…-r³t”) v. in·cor·po·rat·ed, in·cor·po·rat·ing, in·cor·po·rates.

    –tr. 1. To unite (one thing) with something else already in existence: incorporated the letter into her diary. 2. To admit as a member to a corporation or similar organization. 3. To cause to merge or combine together into a united whole. 4. To cause to form into a legal corporation: incorporate a business. 5. To give substance or material form to; embody. –intr. 1. To become united or combined into an organized body. 2. To become or form a legal corporation:
    San Antonio incorporated as a city in 1837. –in·cor·po·rate (-p…r-¹t) adj. 1. Combined into one united body; merged. 2. Formed into a legal corporation. [Middle English incorporaten, from Late Latin incorpor³re, incorpor³t-, to form into a body : Latin in-, in; see IN-2 + Latin corpus, corpor-, body; see CORPUS.] –in·cor“po·ra·ble (-p…r-…-b…l) adj. –in·cor”po·ra“tion n. –in·cor“po·ra”tive adj. –in·cor“po·ra”tor n.

    Preamble to the Bill of Rights
    as submitted with the ORIGINAL articles for ratification.

    The preamble and understanding of it are essential to fully comprehending the full scope and power the Bill of Rights has established for and to each citizen. Your rights are very precious and should NOT be taken for granted in any dealings with government of any level.
    _______________________

    Congress of the United States

    begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March,
    one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine

    THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution:

    RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; vizt.

    ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution. . . .

    FREDERICK AUGUSTUS MUHLENBERG
    Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    JOHN ADAMS, Vice-President of the United States, and President of the Senate.

    ATTEST,
    JOHN BECKLEY, Clerk of the House of Representatives.
    SAM. A. OTIS Secretary of the Senate.

    Amendments to the Constitution of the
    United States of America

    AMENDMENT I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    AMENDMENT II

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    AMENDMENT III

    No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

    AMENDMENT IV

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    AMENDMENT V

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

    AMENDMENT VI

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

    AMENDMENT VII

    In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
    ____________________________________________
    This notation added 12-07-2001
    IMPORTANT The excerpts below are an excellent example of showing the importance of the Sixth and Seventh Amendments to the Constitution. In this case Lloyd R. Long was ACCUSED of violating the law for failure to file an income tax return, in this criminal suit. The income stated by the government for that year was over $49,000.00. The amount in controversy here was definitely well over $20.00 as defined in the Seventh Amendment, which is an important PROTECTION established FOR THE PEOPLE by the Constitution, and this case. But most importantly, it is part of the Supreme Law of our nation, as such, which mandates to ALL courts in the nation.

    The jury found him not guilty on all counts against him in this case.

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~

    EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

    AT CHATTANOOGA
    ——————————————————

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    Plaintiff,

    VS. NO. CR-1-93-91

    LLOYD R. LONG,

    Defendant.

    ——————————————————

    Chattanooga, Tennessee

    October 12, 1993

    BEFORE:

    THE HONORABLE R. ALLAN EDGAR,

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

    JURY TRIAL

    DAY ONE

    VOLUME I

    PAGES 1 thru 222

    Note : The above text is the title of the case from which the clips below were taken.
    IN OPEN COURT

    THE COURT: We’ve received a communication from the jury that it has reached a verdict in
    this case. So, at this time we’ll request that they be brought back.

    (The jury returned to the courtroom,

    and the proceedings continued, in open

    court, as follows:)

    THE COURT: Have a seat, ladies and gentlemen.

    Mr. Kilgore, since you have sent the message here, I take it you have been designated as the foreperson. Is that correct?

    JURY FOREMAN KILGORE: Yes, sir.

    THE COURT: Okay. Has the jury reached a unanimous verdict in this case, Mr. Kilgore?

    JURY FOREMAN KILGORE: Yes, sir.

    THE COURT: Okay. Do you have the verdict form there?

    JURY FOREMAN KILGORE: Yes, sir.

    THE COURT: Please hand it to Ms. Ashby.

    (Foreman complying.)

    THE COURT: All right. If the clerk would read the verdict form.

    THE CLERK: “Question 1. We, the jury, unanimously find the defendant, Lloyd R. Long, is not guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the superseding bill of information.

    “Question 2. We, the jury, unanimously find the defendant, Lloyd R. Long, is not guilty of the offense charged in Count 2 of the superseding bill of information.”

    ________

    252 U.S. 189
    EISNER, Internal Revenue Collector,
    v.
    MACOMBER.
    No. 318.

    Argued April 16, 1919

    Restored to Docket for Reargument, May 19, 1919.
    Reargued Oct. 17 and 20, 1919.
    Decided March 8, 1920.

    [252 U.S. 189, 190]
    Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, for plaintiff in error.
    [252 U.S. 189, 194]
    Messrs. Charles E. Hughes and George Welwood Murray, both of New York City, for defendant in error.
    [252 U.S. 189, 199]
    Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.
    This case presents the question whether, by virtue of the Sixteenth Amendment, Congress has the power to tax, as income of the stockholder and without apportionment, a stock dividend made lawfully and in good faith against profits accumulated by the corporation since March 1, 1913.

    A proper regard for its genesis, as well as its very clear language, requires also that this amendment shall not be extended by loose construction, so as to repeal or modify, except as applied to income, those provisions of the Constitution that require an apportionment according to population for direct taxes upon property, real and personal. This limitation still has an appropriate and important function, and is not to be overridden by Congress or disregarded by the courts.
    In order, therefore, that the clauses cited from article 1 of the Constitution may have proper force and effect, save only as modified by the amendment, and that the latter also may have proper effect, it becomes essential to distinguish between what is and what is not ‘income,’ as the term is there used, and to apply the distinction, as cases arise, according to truth and substance, without regard to form. Congress cannot by any definition it may adopt conclude the matter, since it cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised.

    ______________________________

    AMENDMENT VIII

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    AMENDMENT IX

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    AMENDMENT X

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    _____________________________________________

    Few things in our nation’s history have been as damaging, as the ignornace of the average citizen, to the way money works and the power of who controls it.

    Current printed money is a fraudulent representation of indebtedness against the American People, from which the People do not benefit from, and thus are “enslaved now and for many future generations” to the “money lenders”, by crimes perpetrated against the People. The crimes against the People were and are from sources both foreign and domestic.

    However it does not have to be that way, now or in the future. When the People learn the TRUTH about the Constitution and how their money system was perverted by subterfuge, there will be a major advancement in justice, and PROGRESS within this nation, based on true equality of ALL citizens under the law.

    Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States of America, stated:

    “If our Nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good also makes the bill good.

    The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets money brokers [bankers] collect twice the amount of the bond plus interest. Whereas the bill [currency] pays nobody but those who contribute directly in some useful way.

    The People are the basis for government credit. Why then cannot the people have the benefit of their own credit by receiving non-interest bearing currency, instead of bankers receiving the benefit of the people’s credit in interest bearing bonds?

    It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30 million in bonds and not $30 billion in currency! Both are promises to pay: But one promise fattens usurers and the other helps the people.”

    ________________________________________

    The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on the subject. It is in these words, “I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution, and laws of the United States.”
    Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? If it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?
    If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.
    Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.

    from United States Supreme Court Decision
    Marbury vs. Madison (1803)

    This decision is considered a cornerstone in American law
    ________________________
    end of this page

    1-14-2012

    While the UCC exists, so does the fraudulent concealment of material facts of it, as to the treason of it’s incubation into the American jurisprudence system. English common law was the foundation of the Constitution. When Marbury vs. Madison occurred the FACTS of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution were established. American Common Law BEGINS at Marbury vs. Madison and the USA has NEVER been bankrupt, merely pencil whipped by crooked attorneys, accountants and other wicked and selfish persons BECAUSE of OUR highly distracted CITIZENS who need to be taught TRUE , accurate and complete AMERICAN (USA) history.. The so called 16th amendment IS A HISTORICAL FRAUD and holds no one accountable to the treason protections of Article III of USA Constitution and has NO empowerment clause (compare to 13 and 14) THE UCC when carefully examined historically and Constitutionally, could never withstand Grand Jury examination for it’s treason. It is linked to the Constitutionally repugnant 23rd amendment…….check the UCC passage state by state dates……………..who did they teach it to in public schools grades 1-12………….no one. Thus fraud and treason.

    AMENDMENT VI

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

    • ATT. GEN.? WHERE IN THE U S CONSTITUTION DO YOU FIND ATT. GEN. ?
      NOW READ THE FIFTH ARTICLE OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS OF THE U S CONSTITUTION ! DO YOU FIND ATT. GEN.OR A GRAND JURY/7TH ARTICLE OF THE BILL OF RIGH ( COMMON LAW JURY ) NOT ATT. GEN. ?
      YOU BETTER CHECK YOUR STATE ( not state mind ) TO SEE IF YOU HAVE A GRAND JURY AND GET A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE OATH THAT THEY TOOK WHEN THEY WERE SWORN IN .
      THEY ARE TRYING TO DO AWAY WITH THE GRAND AND PETITE JURY SO THERE IS A LOT OF STATES THAT ALREADY HAVE DONE AWAY WITH THE GRAND AND PETITE JURY BUT WE THE PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY THE FIRST BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT OR GRAND JURY . THEY ARE ALSO TRYING TO TAKE ARTICLE 3 , 9 , 10 , AWAYFROMWE THE PEOPLE
      THATS THE REASON AT 67 YEARS OF AGE I’VE NEVER VOTED FOR A WOLF TO LOOK AFTER MY WHITE/HEN HOUSE

  18. Charles said

    see also a page I put together about our Christian foundation AS A Nation. http://phoenix44.com.tripod.com/id94.htm

    I was “locked out ” and prevented from completing this PUBLIC “free” website by tripod.com, which has since been sold, see Wikipedia info about tripod.com

    Remember, each working citizen who is owed a pay check, is a “creditor”. You labored, but are owed to Article I section 10 cash, pay period by pay period. The perversions to the definitions of common every day language is the main trap infecting the law. Government was given no authority to redefine any word. So old dictionaries are important to see the SLOW METHODICAL distortion to the English language as used in American law. This text from that homepage at tripod.com remains a protection FOR PROPER Citizens, as well as that original work I started and am again working on offline for publication as per an interest in my work………….this time I am taking questions for later published answers and explanations…………….the People is a terminology , in USA law that can only mean proper citizen. Naturalized citizens become so upon their oath to the Constitution, illegal immigrants have not been commited to anyone an can not be trusted and held accountable for the felony of brach of oath, but they certainly can and should be immediately deported so citizens can take their place in the work place Illegals in the southern USA are predominately Roman Catholic, which places an extreme prejudice against NON Catholic Christians, such as myself. American Catholics can be held accountable to treason charges, if for example, the Roman Empire were in “sheep’s clothing” as the Roman Catholic “Holy Roman Empire”………..see also Definitive Treaty of Peace of Sept. 1783 and 1784 which ENDED the American Revolutionary WAR. I’ll be posting an email address later for those interested in this stuff.

  19. troy said

    how do i present the UCC 1-207 in court? do i say it verbaly or do i write it on my affidavit, or some other paper?
    how do i introduce it into trial. i am kind of an ameteur at this , i have studied the meaning, i need to memorize it though

    • Charles said

      Too Citizens who read this,

      Do not waste yor time with the UCC, it is based in fraudulent concealment of material facts and high treason…….1-207 is a disconnect switch FROM that criminal legislation. Stick with USA and State bill of rights. The High court law professor may be associated with being there to protect UCC and the fraudulent 23rd amendment…….study both to see the Constitutional repugnancy of them………then read the NINTH amendment………….over and over till the lights go on in your brains.

    • Charles said

      Knowing the true history of the UCC is as important as understanding the treason it protects. It is “trojan horse linked” to the 23rd amendment. “The twelvth arrticle of amendment” IS the TENTH amendment. It IS the last of the ORIGINAL 12 submitted with the bill of rights……….mainly only law professors and those who study the constitution such as judges would catch that “trojan horse phrasing of text of the 23rd amendment”. The UCC WAS NOT WRITTEN BY YOUR ELECTED PUBLIC OFFICIALS, but rather, “treasonous law professors.

  20. Free Legal said

    I want to try this UCC 1-207 argument when I am court in a few weeks. I hope the judge doesn’t find me in contempt. Will let you know what happens.

  21. online forex account…

    [...]Without Prejudice UCC 1.207 / 1-308 « Daily Truth Pills[...]…

  22. commercial credit insurance…

    [...]Without Prejudice UCC 1.207 / 1-308 « Daily Truth Pills[...]…

  23. Junta-te à Optimus…

    [...]Without Prejudice UCC 1.207 / 1-308 « Daily Truth Pills[...]…

  24. Deveron said

    How does ucc1-308 and Common Law and liens
    work as far as vehicles?

  25. Eliot Rivera said

    I’ve got a question. I was in a criminal case, where I agreed to take misdemeanor pleas, in order to wipe out the felony charge. I have already been to the probation office, twice, which means I have already signed all the necessary paperwork, in order to get on probation. They reserved the right to submit me to breathalyzer tests, as well as, drug tests. Is there anyway that I can use any statute, in the Uniform Commercial Code, if I so choose, not to participate, in the submission of said tests? Or, how about the $1500 that I was ordered to pay?

  26. Frankly said

    Please tell me how can this work in child support case’s…Thank you

  27. johnsmith said

    Demand a jury trial like donald L bren of california. the billionair use his case filings if all men are resposible for ther sperm then why is there no child support for sperm donors the amount is over 20 dollars and its civil and if they say it criminal you have a right to a jury trial also say you demand equal time and residential custody as it is an accepted form of child support to have ur child live in your home an equal amount of time as with the other spouse and you were deprived that privilage with out rime reason or jury trial. firer the lawyer representing your child as you have joint legal custody then it become spousal support and some states dont allow it

  28. Hiya! I simply wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the great information you’ve right here on this post.
    I will probably be coming again to your weblog for extra soon.

  29. Carson said

    Cool blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?
    A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog shine.

    Please let me know where you got your theme.
    Many thanks

  30. Hey There. I stumbled upon your own blog page the employment of windows live messenger. This is a truly snugly authored content. I’ll make sure to take note of the idea in addition to go back to learn extra within your valuable data. Thanks for the posting. I’ll surely come back.

  31. My partner and i take pleasure in, result in I uncovered just what I became searching for. You might have ended our Five evening extended search! God Thank you dude. Have got a excellent day. Bye

  32. Mesha Nicole said

    Any suggestions on Student Loan relief? Seriously, I need help!

  33. Ginger said

    I have a situation that’s different than what I’ve read here. I recently suffered a direct impact whiplash (from my dog no less). It took a few days to rear it’s ugly head and by then i woke unable to swallow without drinking some water even though my mouth was watering like crazy. I saw my Chiropractor and he told me that the inflammation was causing things to trigger and others to shut off. He was also concerned that one carotid artery was bulging. Needless to say by that evening I was exhausted, frightened and confused. I had flushed out my electrolytes and so was faint and shaking uncontrollably. I went to the Emergency room. I repeatedly tried to convey that I had whiplash, inflammation and impinged nerves. The Doctor at one point said why don’t you go back to your Chiropractor. I was so beside myself at this point I couldn’t think well enough to express what I needed. They drew blood, gave me 800 mg’s of Ibuprofen (which helped), told me I needed a CT scan and again I said I had no insurance and asked the cost (they said about 1K) I asked if it was really necessary and they answered it was, in order to determine what was going on. I was then given an IV of saline (which helped) and they wanted to admit me and give me another bag. I refused. I am pretty sure I signed something, maybe a few things, I can’t really remember. The bills are coming in. They’ve charged me for 2 IV’s $263.00, the ibuprofen was 75.00, Lab 378.00 CT scan 7003.00, emergency care 2027.00. The Doctor charged me 625.00 some other Doctor charged me 25.50. for a grand total of $10,396.50. I AM SO VERY DISTRESSED OVER THIS! What if anything can I do?

    • Ginger said

      Please remove this comment. I posted in a time of emotional distress and regret it. I would appreciate it’s removal. It doesn’t really apply to the topic anyway does it.
      Thank you

  34. […] Me: Your honor let the record show that I am reserving my rights under UCC 1-207 not to be bound by any contracts unrevealed to me. (UCC 1-207 Explained) […]

  35. Esther Joy said

    I was reading this article above. I just got a traffic ticket (on friday) for “operating a motor vehicle while using a portable elec dev” I am going to plea not guilty and was wondering if even before showing my face in court if i could simply write a letter using the laws discussed in that article that would quickly just annoy the court to not even want to bother with going through with the rest of the process. A letter that i would send with my ticket plea and request of a supporting deposition which i didn’t receive… Something simple and brief.

    Anyone willing to give a go or an example of a letter of this sort that help dismiss this?

    I have read a few different things where people got off from this method. Traffic tickets are not the “law” they are violations/infractions.. Right? Its a penalty and a fine not a crime!

    • Charles said

      I’m working on some material for the public to study, I/m probably gonna have to set a donation site up…………because it is so time consuming…………enough interest to a modest subcription/donation type set up will help the People help me help them understand what they NEED to know……
      phoenix44.us use the email links so I can see if they work unimpeded by NSA…..
      Charles

  36. Charles said

    Ok this may sound like an unusual request. I am in a child support dispute with my ex whom I have been paying support for my 2 children with an agreement between us for the last 7 years. Recently she got pissed off because I reprimanded 1 of our teenage children and now she wants to drag me to court and have a child support order in place because she already knows how the clowns in this organization rob fathers of every dollar they can because they collect money from the federal government for collecting at the state level. Can anyone tell me how I can stop the government and her in their tracks to stop court proceedings against me by utilizing the UCC codes or Common Law. I know that child support is a civil case and they must bring forth a victim proving that I caused them some sort of harm. Please help if you know how. Again I’m no dead beat dad just trying not to become a victim of the system for the sake of wealth for the local municipality for which I live. Thanks

    • Read Article Seven Of The Bill Of Rights anything that they have ordered you to do is unconstitutional you are Guaranteed the Articles of the Bill Of Rights in writing its in the Boston circular letter . anyhow like I said learn the U S Constitution and teach that to your friends and foe the only way to save the World and Humanity

  37. John said

    I sold a truck back in 2011 from October to November of 2011 . The person who bought the truck was in an accident in December 23 2011 . But didn’t register it in his name until later. Now my my license is suspended because of the accident he had and I did not Owen the truck , he had the tile , what can I do to get my license back ? The law office Lotane is wanting me to pay for the damage to the other vehicle.

    • in the U S Constitution article 1 section 10 articles of confedaration and article seven of the bill of rights , read that until you understand it clearly and if you cant understand it go and get a copy of the federalist papers the unabridged edition there you will find and solve your traveling .
      Compare the 11 th amendment with article three section 2 there is a conflict there article three section two superseedes the 11 th amendment . your declaration of independence reads that you have a right to a common law jury in any controvercy that exceede 20 dollars .
      If you have the time you can learn the U S Constitution and kick their ass all the way to prison . YOU SHOULD HAVE LEARNED THE U S CONSTITUTION ALREADY .

      • John said

        How do you go about , to get the papers to file with the court to reinstate my License, an are the papers called that’s if they have any.??

      • look here Johnn article one section ten they can not propose a contract for you otherwise it would be maybe against your wishes and over your objection , how ever if you like a license then you can except it but you do have a right to object to it guaranteed by the bill of rights .
        now article seven how much does a Goddam licese cost you ? now read article seven again of the Bill Of Rights .
        ASINO !!!

      • John said

        Thank you again , I’m sorry I’ve never been to court or have any problem like this . Thank very much , didn’t mean to waste your time , you have been helping a lot of use out . An again thank you so very much you have a good day an god bless you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 58 other followers

%d bloggers like this: